Certainly speech didn't put a bullet through Congresswoman Giffords' head, that was a young man with "a head full of bad juice," as one of my favorite characters would put it. So, in a fundamentally uncivil society what is the rational response--forget civility, that's tres passe.
We are left with the "Chicago Way" from Brian DePalma's film, the Untouchables:
You wanna know how you do it? Here's how, they pull a knife,And so, we wring our hands and come to the conclusion that being forearmed is the only way to negotiate a society in which the police cannot be counted upon to maintain law, order and peace, we must arm ourselves.
you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his
to the morgue.
That's the Chicago way...
In a society in which guns are prized above the lives of 9 year old girls, federal judges, ladies of small consequence, and political aides, the only rational response is to murder in return. Therefore, I announce that my 25 year principle against the death penalty officially ended. If summoned to serve on a jury in a capital case, I will unhesitatingly be able and willing to vote to put to death a person capable of this kind of violence. Especially, ESPECIALLY! if he uses a handgun to do it.
2 comments:
Mike, I think I know exactly what you mean. Conceptually, I have understood that a society might be allowed to kill someone for the betterment of that society, but I did not used to believe I could be part of such a decision.
Like you, I have unfortunately seen the kind of evil which made me reconsider.
Am I all the way over to thinking I could be part of a jury that finds for the death penalty? Not sure. But I may well be.
Steve! Thanks for your comment. I wasn't aware that Minnesota had the death penalty. Of course, even if it does not, that doesn't mean you couldn't be called on a *federal* capital case, as this one will be.
Post a Comment